Tag: Reuse

  • HPH372: Introducing the circular economy to housing

    HPH372: Introducing the circular economy to housing

    Katherine Adams and Connie Spoor talk about the circular economy and construction, and practical strategies for making reuse a priority on housing projects and self-builds.

    Interview with Katherine Adams and Connie Spoor

    Katherine Adams co-founded Reusefully, a partnership offering advice on the circular economy and the built environment. She is also the technical director for the Alliance for Sustainable Building Products (ASBP). Connie Spoor is a self-builder working on a low embodied carbon Passivhaus and making reuse part of the process.

    The existing dwelling was in extremely poor condition

    Materials for reuse came from Connie’s site

    Connie’s project started with demolishing an existing house and barn. She and her husband wanted to reuse anything they could from the demolition – in particular, local limestone. They chose their architect, David Holland, based on shared values towards reusing materials. All three of them looked out for things that could be reused and incorporated them into the design.

    Connie acknowledges it was a more ‘informal’ approach than Reusefully takes. But because she knew what was being demolished, she could make sure it was factored into the design.

    A good place to start is with a materials inventory

    Katherine works on all types of buildings. The process is always the same, and starts with a materials inventory to understand what is in the building. This involves gathering information (like architectural drawings), though often there isn’t much available.

    Then a site visit allows for a more detailed analysis, albeit without carrying out intrusive investigation. That can result in some guesswork, especially where there are no detailed plans or specifications. Lack of information is particularly difficult when it comes to understanding the structural performance of materials: what they were designed to do, and what they might be capable of when being reused.

    Everything goes into a big spreadsheet to work out dimensions and volumes. From that, a report of recommendations is produced. Reuse is the preference, then recycling. Recycling is still valid, but the key is to try and find better recycling routes.

    Stones were reused in the gabions

    Different materials are reused to different extents

    All materials are useful in some respect, but some are easier to reuse than others. Katherine doesn’t see a lot of timber being reused structurally, because of the associated risks in terms of knowing how it will perform.

    There’s an active market in reclaimed timber, usually for internal uses. You don’t always know how timber has been installed and fixed; for example, it can be difficult to remove bitumen from parquet flooring. But there are people finding innovative ways to reuse timber.

    Katherine knows a company that takes joists and cuts them into floorboards. An organisation called Community Wood Recycling takes wood from sites, regrades it and sells it on. The alternative is chopping up existing timber for panel board or biomass, which Katherine describes as, “a little bit soul destroying.”

    For structural uses, timber could follow the route of the steel industry, which has come together and created a protocol for reclaiming steel, CE marking it, and ensuring it can be insured and warrantied for future projects.

    Concrete reuse is tricky. Because it is so cheap, it’s not viable to re-test and re-certify existing material. There are too many processes to go through.

    A lot of older brick is reused, because it has value. Newer brick doesn’t have the same value. Bricks are relatively cheap, so there’s little incentive to reuse them – especially when they’re bonded with Portland cement, which is really difficult to remove.

    Plastic is particularly hard to recycle

    In terms of recycling plastic, two or three recyclers have closed down recently. Even with government policies in place, there simply isn’t a market for recycling plastic. Construction sites don’t tend to produce much plastic waste, and it isn’t valued enough to segregate or clean. To avoid landfill tax, it usually goes to a waste transfer station where it is turned into pellets and burnt for energy.

    Embodied carbon savings are a big driver for reuse

    Katherine cites a residential refurbishment project that used reclaimed steel beams, saving 3 tonnes of embodied carbon and reducing steel costs by around 40%. Another advantage of reusing existing steel was that they sourced it in just a few days, which reduced lead times significantly. Find out more with the ASBP’s case study.

    Hazardous materials affect reuse or recycling potential

    It can be difficult to know if hazardous materials, like asbestos or lead paint, are present in buildings. If the available information is limited then it can lead to some surprises. Reuse or recycling potential might only become clear if materials are tested, which comes at a cost.

    An important first step that Connie took was to remove anything that would make the rubble unusable, such as plastic windows and all the wiring, before demolition started.

    Communication with demolition contractors is essential

    Connie explained to the contractor what she wanted to achieve, and they separated brick and stone as they worked. Connie’s husband sorted a lot of the metal, separating copper, lead and some steel, for scrap – all of which should be reused or recycled.

    Katherine’s experience is that demolition contractors will recover and recycle as much as possible, because they make money out of materials and they don’t want to pay landfill tax. Recovering materials for reuse often boils down to extra physical effort, whereas most demolition is very mechanised.

    Katherine has found the best approach is to try and nudge companies towards doing a little bit more than they usually would. For example, instead of crushing glass and putting it with aggregate, sending it back to a glass manufacturer as part of a closed loop system.

    Material value is key to making reuse viable

    Connie recognised that if there was value in the material, then it was worth reusing. For example, buying new stone would have been expensive, and she doubts it would have been possible to find anything as nice to fill gabions with. She describes that as, “quite an easy win.”

    Large stones are also being used for cladding on the gable end. That has made financial sense, especially as Connie’s husband is cutting the big stones down to size and installing the smaller pieces as cladding himself.

    Unfortunately, material value can have its downsides, and a bagful of lead was stolen from site.

    Material exchange platforms are a useful resource

    For homeowners and individual sites, the volume of material generated often isn’t big enough for waste management companies to consider it viable. Material exchange platforms are a way to both source and pass on materials that have reuse potential. Although reuse still isn’t very common, the development of exchange platforms is a growing area.

    Examples include:

    Some platforms are focused on commercial buildings. For homeowners and self-builders, the likes of Facebook Marketplace, eBay, Freegle and Gumtree will always be useful. There are also websites that specialise in second hand kitchens, for example.

    Storage of materials is a barrier to reuse

    In an ideal world, materials would be removed from one site and used on another straight away. There is usually a lag between removal and reuse, however, and that means having to store materials somewhere.

    Buildings need to be designed with reuse in mind

    Katherine says that, “a lot of the circular economy is about designing for circular economy outcomes.” Most existing buildings weren’t designed with material recovery in mind.

    Industry is working on designing new buildings for disassembly and deconstruction. A lot is to do with fixings, and making sure they are reversible fixings like screws and bolts. Nails are okay, but glue should be avoided. When thinking about mortars, lime is better than cement.

    Alongside design, a good set of information is essential: keeping drawings, a record of what has been done to the building, who the original manufacturers and suppliers were. All of this really helps reuse. Currently, there’s quite a move towards material passports, which record the materials that have gone in, what certification they’ve got, what their life expectancy is, and who the manufacturer is.

    All of this information adds to the certainty about being able to reuse the materials, but how you keep that information with the building is the challenge – especially in housing.

    Creativity is a big part of reuse

    Katherine advises keeping some flexibility in the design, and shifting mindset to see a building as a ‘material bank’. Rather than having a preconceived idea of what the design will look like, be open to using materials that are already there, or materials that you can find in the various marketplaces.

    Not everything has to be reused or reclaimed. But anybody self-building or retrofitting can think about the materials they’re using and where they’re coming from. Connie has done that, and her next step is to finish the interior of her home with as many reclaimed materials as possible.

    Further inspiration recommended by Katherine:

    Green Tiles Annexe

    A ‘reuseful’ tiny house

    ‘Housing Reclaimed’ book review

    Habitat for Humanity ReStore:

    ‘Reclaimed’ book

    Find out more

    Reusefully

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of this episode.

    Please connect with us

    Subscribe, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow Ben Adam-Smith on Bluesky

  • HPH290 : Being resourceful to bring down the cost of a build – with Colin Rice

    HPH290 : Being resourceful to bring down the cost of a build – with Colin Rice

    Self-building an annexe in an area of coastal erosion meant a low-cost but high-performance build was a priority for architect Colin Rice.

    Interview with Colin Rice

    Colin is a partner at Cullinan Studio, but one of his first jobs after graduating in 1980 was working with Lyall Addleson. Lyall was well-known for his “Handbook of Building Failures”, and Colin worked with him on his investigations into building defects, and subsequent book “Performance of Materials and Buildings.” The time spent having Lyall as a mentor has shaped how Colin has approached architecture throughout the rest of his career.

    Colin has spent three years applying principles he learned during that time to his own self-built annexe at his Green Tiles coastal home.

    Five principles guide how Colin designs

    These are principles that came out of Colin’s work with Lyall and which he has always kept in the back of his mind since.

    First is the constraint which he calls high to low. This applies whether you’re thinking about rainfall or structure and the force of gravity from high to low, but also to things like air pressure and thermal gradients that affect the building envelope.

    Separate lives is his second constraint. He says that lots of buildings suffer defects from ignoring the fact a building is a process, and understanding how the different thermal and moisture properties of the materials will work together or against each other over time.

    The third principle is the objective of continuity, and particularly the continuity of performance. To use the example of a Passivhaus where there is a greater extreme between inside and out, there has to be continuity of all kinds of things, including the air barrier.

    “You’re trying to manage a much greater differential between high and low and you have to do it by thinking very carefully about continuity in the face of the challenge of separate lives.”

    The objective that you’re trying to do is to hold that in balance, which is the fourth principle.

    And finally, creative pessimism is the fifth principle. It could also be thought of as ‘whatever can go wrong at some point will’. By thinking ahead to what could go wrong, Colin says you can come up with smart solutions more creatively.

    Colin’s home is in an area affected by coastal erosion

    Colin’s Green Tiles home is backed by sand dunes along the coastline of Norfolk. It is an area where the cliffs are being eroded at a phenomenal rate, which is only expected to worsen further with the predicted changes to sea levels caused by climate change and global warming.

    Being somewhat unwise to therefore invest huge amounts of money in the project, applying the five principles to his project also helped with keeping the costs down.

    The annexe provides a warm overflow space

    The existing house on the site is a timber frame building of around 6m x 8m, which they have owned since 1998. There was also a 6-berth caravan adjacent to the building which they used as a playroom and then a workshop, before it went into a state of disrepair.

    With the existing house being very cold during the winter months, they managed to get planning permission for a self-contained annexe in which they could stay comfortably during the colder periods and also use as overflow space for accommodating guests.

    Think of planning as being part of the work

    With Colin doing all the work himself, he would use alternate weekends for planning and carpentry at home, and then being on site. While he stresses the importance of careful planning it shouldn’t be at the expense of allowing yourself to make changes and improvements.

    A circular economy style of re-use requires storage space

    As the caravan was in too bad a state of repair to use as a workshop, Colin purchased a shipping container as a replacement. He dismantled the caravan and salvaged components where he could, and used the container for storage.

    A flood strategy was needed for planning consent

    Being situated in a low-lying area at the bottom of a hill, which can have standing water for several months, they were unable to use traditional foundations. Instead, they have used damped down crushed aggregate with railway sleepers on top. The timber frame, which Colin simplified by planning around standard timber sizes, is strutted off the sleepers to allow any floodwater to flow underneath.

    Prioritising performance doubled his initial budget

    Originally Colin had a budget of just £12,000 for his build, but that was before he made the decision to prioritise performance and apply for building regulations approval.

    Taking that decision meant an increase in costs of glazing and insulation so his final spend was just under £25,000, which works out at slightly less than £850 per square metre, including VAT and all the internal fitting out.

    Colin built the annexe himself at weekends

    He spent £2,000 on the double glazed units, which he designed on a “drip dry” principle where the sheet of glass overhangs the wall below, and is overhung by the wall above.

    Rather than using off-the-shelf I-studs, which would have weighed 90kg and cost £90 each, Colin made his own C-studs weigh 60kg and costing £60 each. He says they wouldn’t be strong enough for a multi-storey building, but for his single-storey dwelling they are perfectly adequate, thermally efficient and light enough to handle more easily when doing the construction yourself.

    The roof and walls are insulated by filling the cavity with Warmcel cellulose insulation. The roof joist insulation is held in place with plasterboard and a thin layer of OSB on the underside.

    The cold roof has a deck which carries the waterproof membrane. It is designed to be cold because it has a ventilation space underneath it. It relies on air movement through the cavity to clear moisture and things that can cause decay of the timber.

    Being thrifty can be fun!

    Colin has tried to reuse as many materials as possible in the construction and fit-out of the annexe, even down to the microwave glass plate fixed into a hole in the wall to make a window into the bathroom!

    He never throws things away as they might be useful someday, and says he is also an opportunist. He has utilised off-cuts of wood from Cullinan’s previous office and among other things has taken apart an old bench sander to use the cogged rubber belt drive on a drop-down window in the annexe.

    Reused features in the Annexe

    Ask the question “If I take this apart, will I be able to use it again?”

    Colin’s tips for tackling a high performance project on a small budget are:

    • Use eBay and similar sites for sourcing materials
    • If you have the space, use a shed or container for storage
    • Plan on a modular basis for avoiding waste
    • Design in a way that doesn’t rely on glues and sealants

    Find out more

    Visit Cullinan Studio’s website

    Follow Colin on Twitter

    Transcript

    Please connect with me

    Subscribe, rate and review the podcast in iTunes

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow us on Twitter

  • HPH261 : Reducing construction waste and reusing materials – with Duncan Baker-Brown

    HPH261 : Reducing construction waste and reusing materials – with Duncan Baker-Brown

    Duncan Baker-Brown from BBM Sustainable Design explains how we can reduce waste on our projects, given a little more time and with a different approach on site.

    With the construction industry being such a big contributor of annual waste, he also shares strategies for how we could transform things if we treat buildings as material banks, which are built with deconstruction in mind.

    Interview with Duncan Baker-Brown

    Duncan Baker-Brown and Ian McKay set up BBM Sustainable Design 25 years ago. The company has a passion for finding environmentally friendly solutions to architectural challenges, and carries out research projects to inform his practice, and vice versa. Duncan also teaches at the University of Brighton.

    An area of ‘protected’ rainforest is being mined for its resources

    Reducing consumption is crucial

    The construction industry is a huge consumer of raw materials, accounting for around 50% of those that are mined across the world. The resultant deforestation and destruction is a key reason why Duncan believes we should be trying to consume far less.

    Although on an international level many leaders seem to be ignoring the crisis, Duncan sees hope on a more regional level where groups and states seem to be taking matters into their own hands and making commitments to address climate change.

    “There’s no such thing as waste, it’s just stuff in the wrong place”

    Duncan defines a circular economy as being a world where one area’s waste, is a valuable resource for another area.

    The UK construction industry is responsible for 60% of annual waste

    With 600 million tonnes of things being bought in the UK every year, 200 million tonnes is thrown away. Of that waste, 120 million tonnes comes from the construction industry.

    Traditionally, resources are thrown at a site in order to keep it busy and not have delays while waiting for materials. This means a tendency to over order on materials by around 10% for wastage, resulting in around 10-15% of everything arriving on site being thrown away. With this cumulative effect on site, it means that for every six or seven houses that are built in the UK, one house worth of waste will go to landfill or incineration.

    Instead we should only be ordering the goods that are needed, planning the projects better so there aren’t periods of delay, and value the materials that actually arrive on site.

    We could also be shopping in a much smarter way. BBM do a resource map for their projects where they look within a 10km or so radius of the site and work out what resources might be nearby. That could mean a factory producing something, a woodland that’s managed for timber, or even a building site that is being deconstructed where they can salvage materials.

    “But it takes a different mentality and sensibility. And the big deal is the time to educate yourselves around the potential of a circular economy to provide a better product at the end of the day, and being able to be beneficial to the environment as well.”

    The Waste House

    In 2014, BBM completed the Brighton Waste House, an experimental project that was built by students under the guidance of the university. Initially the aim was to build a high performance house out of the material that normally goes to landfill or incineration. During the design and development stages they partnered Freegle UK, whose founder Cat Fletcher, suggested they raise awareness of the things that are thrown away on a daily basis, not just in the construction industry but in our everyday lives. It changed from being a project that proved construction waste was valuable, to a project that became more of a thought-provoker.

    The house was subsequently designed as almost a container for the waste products: a vessel for holding lots of products that had been designed without an end of life strategy. They used the plastic waste products as low grade insulation, and included 4,000 VHS tapes, and 25,000 toothbrushes (all unused) that were collected in just four days from Gatwick Airport!

    With 90% of the material used being other people’s waste, it performs to around Passivhaus standards.

    While they proved that it can be done, Duncan says it would take an experienced architect or contractor to understand the potential for using second hand material. With issues around insurance and guarantee of second hand materials, at the moment we don’t have the legislation or networks to support everybody doing it easily.

    Duncan certainly isn’t saying we should be using waste plastic in our homes, and if he did the project again he would use a resource map for construction and other materials to make a building that was a material store for the future.

    “What I would like to do is a project where maybe we find a building that is unwanted, and we deconstruct it and then reconstruct it with new owners, new use, new site. And the architectural challenge, apart from the deconstruction and reconstruction, would be how to tweak the building so it accommodates the new criteria – our new standards for insulation and energy production and that sort of stuff.”

    Lendager Group have reused an old brick facade

    Think through how you can limit waste on a self build

    If you’re doing a self build project, the best thing you can do is look to reduce your waste on site to zero. By using a pre-fabricated build system for example, you will only have delivered what you actually need. A further benefit is that things that arrive flat-packed and screwed together, could ultimately one day be unscrewed and reused.

    Avoid using the wet trades as far as possible too. As soon as you start mixing things with water there tends to be far more waste.

    Buildings can be material stores for the future

    On a large scale looking at financial industry buildings, Duncan explains that many are only designed with a business plan of perhaps 25 years, after which time they’re demolished and a new flagship building put in their place.

    He describes a project in Amsterdam by ABN AMRO bank. It’s an £18 million Circle Pavilion project, which has been designed so that when it is deconstructed in however many years time, the materials and components are assets that can be sold off or reused on other projects. As well as making financial sense it will avoid sending all the waste to landfill.

    Duncan sees a future circular economy having two spheres: a biosphere and a techsphere. The biosphere being everything that is made of natural materials that can be reused a number of times before they eventually become compost for the natural world. The techsphere incorporates those things that won’t decompose so will need more work to establish how they can be designed to be deconstructed and used again.

    Corporate responsibility is needed for end of life strategies

    Duncan believes there needs to be corporate responsibility of manufactured items, so when something comes to the end of its life, it becomes the responsibility of the manufacturer, not the end user.

    This fits in with the idea of things being material banks, where at the end of their life they would actually be an asset.

    The idea of lease agreements is gaining traction, particularly in Europe. One example is Philips who provide leased light fittings to buildings. The benefit to the end user is that Philips are likely to be supplying them with their most robust fittings because they don’t want to be repeatedly coming out to change the lightbulbs. And from Philips perspective, at the end of their lifespan they are able to take back the fittings and use the parts to make new ones.

    “And from a design point of view, and that’s whether you’re designing a light fitting or a phone or a building, it needs a different way of designing. You need to think about it differently, because you’re thinking about how to take apart the thing that you’re assembling as you’re designing it.”

    Differences can be made on self build and large construction scales

    On a self build scale, websites like Freecycle and Freegle can be a source of finding, or recycling materials. On a general construction industry level, Duncan says there will need to be changes to the buildings regulations to demand and facilitate reuse of materials.

    While some of the large contractors are already moving surplus materials internally to other projects, Duncan thinks it can only be a couple of years before large contractors will start swapping with each other.

    “I’m trying to communicate a really clear message because a lot of people are going to be crunching carbon numbers etc and trying to be carbon neutral and all that sort of stuff. And I just think that’s really difficult I think to understand how to really do it, and I think it’s a lot more straightforward just to say carbon is one of the things that we’ve got to reduce, but we’ve really got to reduce the amount of water we use, the amount of energy we use and the amount of materials and components that we use when we’re designing, building, inhabiting, maintaining, and ultimately deconstructing the built environment that we live and work and play in.”

    Find out more

    Visit the website of BBM Sustainable Design

    Follow BBM Sustainable Design on Twitter

    Read about more examples in Duncan’s book

    The Re-use Atlas

    Transcript

    Please connect with me

    Subscribe, rate and review the podcast in iTunes

    Rate and review the podcast on Stitcher

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow us on Twitter