Tag: plastic

  • HPH272 : What is the problem with plastic? – with Emily Penn

    HPH272 : What is the problem with plastic? – with Emily Penn

    Skipper and oceans advocate Emily Penn explains the damage that plastic pollution is having on our oceans, and how we can find solutions.

    Interview with Emily Penn

    Emily is co-founder and director of eXXpedition; an all-female crew research expedition that are circumnavigating the planet to investigate the causes of and solutions to plastic pollution. She is dedicated to studying environmental challenges and is a public speaker and adviser on issues relating to our oceans.

    Plastic can take on many shapes and forms

    Plastic starts life as oil, which is taken from the ground and turned into different types of polymers, depending on what properties the finished plastic will need and what its use will be.

    The types of plastic and their uses include: PET (for disposable drinks bottles), HDPE (cloudy milk bottles), PVC (windows, drain pipes etc), low-density polyethylene (plastic bags), polypropylene (a hard and durable plastic), polystyrene (packaging), plus a final category that also includes biodegradable plastics.

    Plastic fragments

    Plastic can accumulate in ocean gyres

    Data shows that around 80% of plastic in the ocean is coming from land, and 20% from ships. At sea the largest contributor is the fishing industry, with lost lines, polystyrene lids, nets etc. There are also a surprising number of containers that fall from ships with their contents being scattered. The discovery of some of these contents which have washed up across the globe have actually helped scientists understand more about ocean currents.

    While some plastic waste spreads far across the planet, others can be found in gyres. These are the calm patches at the centre of rotating currents in the ocean.

    Discarded fishing tackle

    The biggest problem is beneath the surface

    While some plastics float on the surface, others are broken down into smaller fragments by UV rays, wind and waves and can start to sink. Statistics show there’s around eight million tonnes of plastic that leaves the land and ends up in the oceans each year, but only around a quarter of a million tonnes can be accounted for on the surface. Most likely the majority of that is sinking so deep that we don’t really know what’s happening to it.

    Microplastics are hazardous to marine life and can enter the food chain

    Emily explains how it is very easy for birds, fish and marine mammals to mistake plastic for food. Once they eat it they can die of starvation as it sits in their stomachs and they can’t get any good nutrients in. She describes a recent dissection she worked on in Hawaii of a sea turtle, where they found 78 pieces of plastic inside its stomach and gut.

    As well as issues of starvation and entanglement for marine life, there is also the impact of the chemical hazards associated with the breakdown of the plastics and also how this can impact humans in the food chain.

    Emily highlights other chemical compounds, such as those used to make things fire resistant or weather proof, that also end up as a pollutant in the marine environment once they’re washed in washing machines and eventually make their way to the ocean. Making their way back into the food chain they can be carcinogens and disrupt hormones.

    Stop the waste leaving the land

    With trillions of fragments in the oceans so small that they can’t be removed without also removing other marine life, algae and plankton, Emily says the solution is to look further upstream and prevent the plastic from ever getting into the sea or on the land.

    “Better still, the next stage is closing the loop. If we are using plastic, how can we make sure it gets recovered right at the point that it’s finished its use so it can stay in a closed loop system?

    But better still than that is just avoiding it completely. How can we switch to alternative products and really alternative systems that mean we can live life without plastic?”

    Design for end of life

    If you’re looking for something to last forever, then plastic can be a good material, but it is important to think of what will happen when it is no longer required. We should be ensuring that it can be taken apart and reused for something else, and avoid using composite materials that are different types of plastic all stuck together that can’t then be used again.

    “We so often design for the primary function but we don’t design for end-of-life. And I think that’s the ultimate message. We just need to think about what happens at the end.”

    Close the loop

    In Norway and Germany 98% of the bottles are recycled in a closed loop system. The price of the bottle is artificially inflated by a financial deposit that you pay at the point of purchase. That is repaid in a sort of reverse vending machine when the bottles are returned, thus incentivising people to return the bottles in a good condition.

    Down-cycling is more prevalent rather than recycling

    Emily says there is a misconception about our plastic waste being recycled, with it actually being as little as 9% of the plastic we use. For all the different types of plastic, in the UK only PET and HDPE are recycled, and even less than that in other parts of the world.

    Many people’s understanding of recycling is that it is an ongoing circular process where things continually are turned into something else. In reality, Emily says that plastic bottle or PET packaging might be turned into a bus shelter, drainpipe or carpet, which can’t then be turned into anything else. It’s not a closed loop system and she describes it as more like down-cycling than recycling.

    eXXpedition has three aims

    Emily and her crew set off in 2019 on a two year circumnavigation of the planet conducting scientific research to understand where the solutions lie.

    A large part of what they are trying to do is to understand the make-up of the anonymous soup that is a quarter of a million tonnes of plastic floating on the surface. By understanding whether it is tyre dust from cars, or polyester microfibres from clothes in the washing machine for example, they can pinpoint where the opportunities on land will lie.

    The second of the three aims is about storytelling, and passing on important messages about the Ocean’s beauty, the challenges it is facing and how crucial it is for our own survival.

    And thirdly, it is about building community and taking people with different skills from different backgrounds and different countries to work on the problem together and drive solutions.

    The challenge is turning the greater awareness into action

    The last couple of years have seen a big change in the public consciousness about the issue and companies are waking up and wanting to do something about it, even if they’re not entirely sure yet what it is they should be doing.

    “The challenge we have now is turning all of that great awareness into action so that the ocean can feel the results. Because I crossed the Pacific again last summer, ten years on from that first time, and there was more plastic in the Pacific last summer than on really any of my other expeditions.

    That was a little bit disheartening especially among all of this great energy around the issue. But I don’t think it’s too late. I think we need to act now but I do think we can do it.”

    Self-builders can work with suppliers to reduce waste

    With self-building comes a lot of packaging, much of which is single use. Emily suggests trying to work with the suppliers to try and find a solution whereby perhaps the packaging could be reusable and returned, which also has a financial incentive for them.

    With so much material already out there in the world, Emily would advise looking to use reclaimed materials wherever possible. Even better if you take the site itself and are able to keep as many existing materials there as possible without producing waste or importing new things.

    Have conversations around the issues

    Emily welcomes people following eXXpedition and becoming part of the movement.

    She is also involved with OceanChangeMakers.com which has a toolkit of resources to help people take ideas into their own lives, homes and businesses, and really look at what more they can do.

    “But most of all, I would just encourage everybody to ask questions, realise that actually lots of other people around them are asking the same questions, and have these conversations. Whether it’s your supplier who you’re working with or some sort of waste that you’re trying to deal with. Start talking about it because there are always ways to solve these problems.”

    Healthy Buildings Conference and Expo

    The Alliance for Sustainable Building Products are hold the Healthy Buildings Conference and Expo. Emily Penn was a keynote speaker in 2019 and you can check out their website for details of who will be presenting at this year’s event.

    Find out more

    Visit the website of Emily Penn

    Visit the website of Ocean Change Makers

    Transcript

    Please connect with us

    Subscribe, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow Ben Adam-Smith on Bluesky

  • HPH261 : Reducing construction waste and reusing materials – with Duncan Baker-Brown

    HPH261 : Reducing construction waste and reusing materials – with Duncan Baker-Brown

    Duncan Baker-Brown from BBM Sustainable Design explains how we can reduce waste on our projects, given a little more time and with a different approach on site.

    With the construction industry being such a big contributor of annual waste, he also shares strategies for how we could transform things if we treat buildings as material banks, which are built with deconstruction in mind.

    Interview with Duncan Baker-Brown

    Duncan Baker-Brown and Ian McKay set up BBM Sustainable Design 25 years ago. The company has a passion for finding environmentally friendly solutions to architectural challenges, and carries out research projects to inform his practice, and vice versa. Duncan also teaches at the University of Brighton.

    An area of ‘protected’ rainforest is being mined for its resources

    Reducing consumption is crucial

    The construction industry is a huge consumer of raw materials, accounting for around 50% of those that are mined across the world. The resultant deforestation and destruction is a key reason why Duncan believes we should be trying to consume far less.

    Although on an international level many leaders seem to be ignoring the crisis, Duncan sees hope on a more regional level where groups and states seem to be taking matters into their own hands and making commitments to address climate change.

    “There’s no such thing as waste, it’s just stuff in the wrong place”

    Duncan defines a circular economy as being a world where one area’s waste, is a valuable resource for another area.

    The UK construction industry is responsible for 60% of annual waste

    With 600 million tonnes of things being bought in the UK every year, 200 million tonnes is thrown away. Of that waste, 120 million tonnes comes from the construction industry.

    Traditionally, resources are thrown at a site in order to keep it busy and not have delays while waiting for materials. This means a tendency to over order on materials by around 10% for wastage, resulting in around 10-15% of everything arriving on site being thrown away. With this cumulative effect on site, it means that for every six or seven houses that are built in the UK, one house worth of waste will go to landfill or incineration.

    Instead we should only be ordering the goods that are needed, planning the projects better so there aren’t periods of delay, and value the materials that actually arrive on site.

    We could also be shopping in a much smarter way. BBM do a resource map for their projects where they look within a 10km or so radius of the site and work out what resources might be nearby. That could mean a factory producing something, a woodland that’s managed for timber, or even a building site that is being deconstructed where they can salvage materials.

    “But it takes a different mentality and sensibility. And the big deal is the time to educate yourselves around the potential of a circular economy to provide a better product at the end of the day, and being able to be beneficial to the environment as well.”

    The Waste House

    In 2014, BBM completed the Brighton Waste House, an experimental project that was built by students under the guidance of the university. Initially the aim was to build a high performance house out of the material that normally goes to landfill or incineration. During the design and development stages they partnered Freegle UK, whose founder Cat Fletcher, suggested they raise awareness of the things that are thrown away on a daily basis, not just in the construction industry but in our everyday lives. It changed from being a project that proved construction waste was valuable, to a project that became more of a thought-provoker.

    The house was subsequently designed as almost a container for the waste products: a vessel for holding lots of products that had been designed without an end of life strategy. They used the plastic waste products as low grade insulation, and included 4,000 VHS tapes, and 25,000 toothbrushes (all unused) that were collected in just four days from Gatwick Airport!

    With 90% of the material used being other people’s waste, it performs to around Passivhaus standards.

    While they proved that it can be done, Duncan says it would take an experienced architect or contractor to understand the potential for using second hand material. With issues around insurance and guarantee of second hand materials, at the moment we don’t have the legislation or networks to support everybody doing it easily.

    Duncan certainly isn’t saying we should be using waste plastic in our homes, and if he did the project again he would use a resource map for construction and other materials to make a building that was a material store for the future.

    “What I would like to do is a project where maybe we find a building that is unwanted, and we deconstruct it and then reconstruct it with new owners, new use, new site. And the architectural challenge, apart from the deconstruction and reconstruction, would be how to tweak the building so it accommodates the new criteria – our new standards for insulation and energy production and that sort of stuff.”

    Lendager Group have reused an old brick facade

    Think through how you can limit waste on a self build

    If you’re doing a self build project, the best thing you can do is look to reduce your waste on site to zero. By using a pre-fabricated build system for example, you will only have delivered what you actually need. A further benefit is that things that arrive flat-packed and screwed together, could ultimately one day be unscrewed and reused.

    Avoid using the wet trades as far as possible too. As soon as you start mixing things with water there tends to be far more waste.

    Buildings can be material stores for the future

    On a large scale looking at financial industry buildings, Duncan explains that many are only designed with a business plan of perhaps 25 years, after which time they’re demolished and a new flagship building put in their place.

    He describes a project in Amsterdam by ABN AMRO bank. It’s an £18 million Circle Pavilion project, which has been designed so that when it is deconstructed in however many years time, the materials and components are assets that can be sold off or reused on other projects. As well as making financial sense it will avoid sending all the waste to landfill.

    Duncan sees a future circular economy having two spheres: a biosphere and a techsphere. The biosphere being everything that is made of natural materials that can be reused a number of times before they eventually become compost for the natural world. The techsphere incorporates those things that won’t decompose so will need more work to establish how they can be designed to be deconstructed and used again.

    Corporate responsibility is needed for end of life strategies

    Duncan believes there needs to be corporate responsibility of manufactured items, so when something comes to the end of its life, it becomes the responsibility of the manufacturer, not the end user.

    This fits in with the idea of things being material banks, where at the end of their life they would actually be an asset.

    The idea of lease agreements is gaining traction, particularly in Europe. One example is Philips who provide leased light fittings to buildings. The benefit to the end user is that Philips are likely to be supplying them with their most robust fittings because they don’t want to be repeatedly coming out to change the lightbulbs. And from Philips perspective, at the end of their lifespan they are able to take back the fittings and use the parts to make new ones.

    “And from a design point of view, and that’s whether you’re designing a light fitting or a phone or a building, it needs a different way of designing. You need to think about it differently, because you’re thinking about how to take apart the thing that you’re assembling as you’re designing it.”

    Differences can be made on self build and large construction scales

    On a self build scale, websites like Freecycle and Freegle can be a source of finding, or recycling materials. On a general construction industry level, Duncan says there will need to be changes to the buildings regulations to demand and facilitate reuse of materials.

    While some of the large contractors are already moving surplus materials internally to other projects, Duncan thinks it can only be a couple of years before large contractors will start swapping with each other.

    “I’m trying to communicate a really clear message because a lot of people are going to be crunching carbon numbers etc and trying to be carbon neutral and all that sort of stuff. And I just think that’s really difficult I think to understand how to really do it, and I think it’s a lot more straightforward just to say carbon is one of the things that we’ve got to reduce, but we’ve really got to reduce the amount of water we use, the amount of energy we use and the amount of materials and components that we use when we’re designing, building, inhabiting, maintaining, and ultimately deconstructing the built environment that we live and work and play in.”

    Find out more

    Visit the website of BBM Sustainable Design

    Follow BBM Sustainable Design on Twitter

    Read about more examples in Duncan’s book

    The Re-use Atlas

    Transcript

    Please connect with me

    Subscribe, rate and review the podcast in iTunes

    Rate and review the podcast on Stitcher

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow us on Twitter