Tag: planning consent

  • HPH199 : The challenges of building close to your boundaries – with Oliver Smallman

    HPH199 : The challenges of building close to your boundaries – with Oliver Smallman

    Self-builder Oliver Smallman tells us about planning, building and living in his London Passivhaus.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    Interview with Oliver Smallman

    Oliver and his wife are not absolute beginners at self-building. They co-designed a house in Corfu where they have lived on and off for 27 years. As Oliver sums it up, “Probably not the best design I’ve ever seen in the world, but with the most remarkable view.”

    Photo courtesy of RDA (http://www.rdauk.com/)

    A rare chance to build green in London

    While the Corfu project was a tremendous experience, Oliver had no intention of self-building again. However, when he had an opportunity to buy a house in Chiswick, with an unusually large garden, he saw the chance to use new, ecological building methods to build a Passivhaus.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    The sunken design meant opting for concrete

    Oliver designed his Passivhaus with Richard Dudzicki, of RDA Architects. They originally planned to use Structural Insulated Panels but the site was very constrained and Richard saw the potential for sinking the house below ground. Thus they chose a piled site and a concrete build.

    Oliver had already fallen in love with the use of boarded concrete and explains, “The concrete walls on the interior, boarded and plain and smooth, were always in the plan.” The mixture of textures is part of what Oliver calls, “concrete as a look”; they even allowed the errors of the pouring to remain.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    The brief called for concrete, convenience and light

    As well as using concrete, Oliver wanted to avoid the house being dark. He says lots of glazing along the south of the house works well for a Passivhaus.

    In terms of style, he had grown used to travelling in his work life and Oliver appreciates functional touches like having the lights over your bed and the switch at hand. “It’s a little bit “hotel-y” but it really suits me,” he says.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    Neighbours objected to the modern design

    Although the planning application was recommended for approval, about 40 local residents came to the planning meeting with extremely negative reactions and three councillors stopped the application.

    One reason given was excessive size, despite the majority of the house being underground. They also argued the house was not “in keeping with the area” but Oliver has a different perspective, asking, “Why would you build a replica of a house that was built in 1949 or 1950? You’d be mad!”

    © Tim Wilcockson

    Repeated planning applications didn’t just pay lip service

    Rather than sacrifice his contemporary design, Oliver tried to absorb feedback to gain his neighbours’ support. This meant some meaningful compromises where the design was blended in. For example, Oliver chose to match the white exterior walls and bricks of the other houses in the road.

    A smaller second design allowed more green space, but the application was rejected again. Oliver then lost his appeal on the grounds that he wasn’t providing parking. Further reducing the top floor enabled off-street parking to be included in the next application.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    Getting planning consent took four applications

    Having seen the application a number of times, twelve Council members gave up their Saturday morning to come and look at the site. The opposition party made representations but Oliver says they made the mistake of behaving rudely. As he explains, “I think the Council officers probably thought, ‘You lot are nuts and this guy’s doing something perfectly reasonable.’”

    At the next vote, the same three councillors objected, but the others disagreed, so planning permission was finally granted four years into the process. Oliver notes that the final design fits the street and has become accepted. The modern house is softened by use of greenery and locally appropriate materials.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    Research led to the right concrete and windows

    Although Oliver was inspired by the use of concrete in stations like Westminster, his design contrasts it with wooden floors. In addition, he used Portland Whitener to lighten the colour. Oliver went to the Concrete Centre and signed up for the course in concrete pouring. “You can’t just phone up a concrete company and they bring you concrete and pour it and then it looks like this,” he says.

    Oliver also did a lot of research to find the right triple-glazed windows. He has been happy with the certified Passivhaus windows and service provided by Internorm.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    A tight urban site presented challenges

    The eight by eighteen metre site meant building close to boundary walls. The existing house had to be underpinned and Oliver needed to protect his neighbour’s house and cherry tree while digging a four-metre hole within three metres of them. To give Oliver the security to start digging out, a specialist company was used to sink the concrete piles.

    Digging a large hole on such a tight site meant that space for storage and machinery was permanently on the move. As Oliver says, “It’s like a dance. When we were piling it, the piler would be in one corner, the concrete machine would have to be in another one.” They even built a platform to put the digger on to remove the last piece of soil.

     

    © Tim Wilcockson

    The Passivhaus offers comfortable, healthy living

    When the house was complete, Oliver actually rented it out for a while. Staying in his existing draughty house meant he appreciated the difference even more when he moved in. Three things surprised him. Firstly, how quiet the concrete-built, triple-glazed house is. Secondly, the fantastic air quality and thirdly, living draught free, with the same temperature everywhere.

    Oliver isn’t dogmatic about the Passivhaus method but is extremely satisfied. “There may well be better solutions in the future, but I’ve now had the opportunity to live in this house for nearly a year and I absolutely love it,” he says.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    Leaving a legacy costs more

    Oliver’s house is designed to last and be efficient. As he explains, “I’m trying to build something that uses very little power and little energy, and I’ll be long gone but it’ll be a very valuable asset either for my own children or for somebody else.” In fact, he says his energy costs are easily under £500 a year.

    However, Oliver admits the build cost more than he’d intended, saying, “I thought I could do it for £400,000 and I built it for £600,000 finished.” Digging out the soil had been much more expensive due to bad weather. Moreover, he could have saved on some specifications but paid more for feel and durability. For example, he fell in love with the floor in the Saatchi Gallery. He reveals it cost “a crazy amount of money” but the untreated Douglas Fir will last hundreds of years and could be sanded a thousand times.

    © Tim Wilcockson

    Oliver’s tips for self-builders

    Commercial builders tend to avoid low energy builds as they are less profitable, but Oliver remarks that the more people who put up good buildings, the more the country as a whole will benefit.

    His key advice is to persevere. As well as using Google for research, he has two other top tips for green builders:

    Find out more

    UK Passivhaus Awards 2016

    RDA Architects

     

    Watch a video on Chiswick Eco Lodge

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with Oliver Smallman

    Please connect with me

  • HPH188 : What are Paragraph 80 builds and how do they work? – with Richard Hawkes from Hawkes Architecture

    HPH188 : What are Paragraph 80 builds and how do they work? – with Richard Hawkes from Hawkes Architecture

    Richard Hawkes from Hawkes Architecture tells us about the exceptional circumstances in which planning for rural new builds may be granted.

    *Since recording this podcast, the government has updated the National Planning Policy Framework. ‘Paragraph 55’ (or ‘Para 55’) policy changed in name to ‘Paragraph 79’ and then ‘Paragraph 80′, although the content remains largely unchanged. * 

    We have amended the show notes but the interview will still talk about Paragraph 55.

    Interview with Richard Hawkes

    Richard Hawkes’ self-build, Crossway, helped launch his own practice Hawkes Architecture nine years ago. Before that he worked at a large commercial practice in London.

    As planning is rarely granted for new rural homes, Richard had to learn what circumstances were considered exceptions. His expertise then led to work gaining planning consent for others in similar circumstances. Nowadays Richard even sits on a Design Review Panel, made up of professionals including landscape architects and engineers, that advises planners whether or not a proposal is meeting policy.

    Crossway

    Planning policy allows rural development in exceptional circumstances

    Paragraph 79 has four special circumstances that can permit a new dwelling in the countryside:

    1. An agricultural worker’s dwelling. It’s quite difficult to create a business case for these so they don’t happen very often.
    2. Re-use of a heritage asset, e.g. saving a listed building.
    3. Re-use of redundant farm buildings. Relaxation of permitted development legislation has made this moot for now.
    4. If the dwelling is of exceptional quality or innovative in its nature of design. All of Richard’s Paragraph 79 projects fall into this last category.

    Four tests determine if a design is sufficiently exceptional

    For a dwelling to be of exceptional quality or innovative in its nature of design, it has to pass all of these tests:

    • Help to raise the standards of design more generally in rural areas
    • Be of the highest standards in architecture
    • Significantly enhance the immediate setting
    • Be sensitive to the defining characteristics of the local area
    Hawkhurst

    Paragraph 79 is an important design-led policy

    Since Planning’s introduction in 1946, there has been a reluctance to approve new homes in the countryside. Green Belt, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), Heritage Coast and other designations evidence this. Even Paragraph 79, which Richard describes as a piece of national policy originally introduced in 1997 to enable landowners to get permission for their “English country house”, states that planning authorities should generally seek to resist new dwellings.

    In 2003 the Labour government sought to get rid of (then) Paragraph 55 which they felt was an elitist policy, but were lobbied by the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) who argued the policy would move forward dwelling design. As a result, the policy evolved into PPS 7, Paragraph 11 and actually used the term ‘contemporary architecture’.

    The policy recognises the mediocrity of typical dwelling design, and has a practical significance in terms of architects’ professional development. It encourages them to learn how to respond to a setting and produce amazing buildings. Richard explains that the principles of good design can be looked at entirely objectively, even if people’s responses to design are inherently subjective.

    Sustainability must be factored into the design

    A beautiful house isn’t enough. A house of the highest standards in architecture will incorporate lots of insulation, heat recovery ventilation, triple-glazing, and passive solar gain. Richard describes these Passivhaus principles as just sensible design and something planners would expect to see in a Paragraph 79 scheme, not reasons why they would grant consent.

    The nature of the site and its management will often tie in to the energy strategy they develop for each individual building.

    West Pearroc

    There are different types of Paragraph 79 house

    Some locations suit a contrasting building, like an English country house. Richard describes this as unapologetically “dominating its landscape. Enhancing it but very much in contrast to it.”

    Conversely, one of his own Paragraph 79 houses on a Green Belt / AONB site needed to show sensitivity to the defining characteristics of the local area and significantly enhance the immediate setting. His architecture enhanced the farmstead by reinforcing the positive qualities of stable buildings on the site while removing other buildings that were “detractors”.

    Likelihood of planning consent must first be weighed up

    Richard’s team must first establish whether the site has the right ingredients to get a planning consent. He uses the analogy of a set of weighing scales, and there are several factors weighing down the ‘wrong side’:

    • You’re not allowed to build a house in the open countryside.
    • In Green Belt, there is the principle of openness. If the site has other buildings on it, you can potentially look at “consolidating building form” as a strategy. If there are no buildings there at all, it becomes very difficult.
    • AONB are protected by National Policy. It is possible, but more complex as these are highly protected pieces of land.
    • If it’s a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) or on top of a hill, any development is likely to have a big visual impact.

    No one can guarantee planning consent, so Richard tries to manage that risk. To “balance the scales” he carries out a rigorous analysis of local and national policy to find benefits that could come with a scheme.

    The landscape and architecture have to work together

    Assuming there’s a robust enough case to proceed, Paragraph 79 applications are not for the faint-hearted; they represent a big investment on the client’s part and are about the land as much as the house. It takes months before Richard will even know what they’re designing.

    Time is spent with landscape architects and commissioning reports and surveys to adequately understand the ecology, biodiversity and resources of the site. This long process uncovers minute details about animals, sun, prevailing wind direction, climate and geology.

    Richard explains that involving a landscape architect right at the start helps them to lay down some rules about the site: sensitivities to avoid and opportunities to embrace. The ‘master plan’ is holistic and everything included in the plan can be justified.

    Examples of ways to enhance the landscape might include:

    • Binding the site together with areas of woodland
    • Linking habitats
    • Bolstering woodland edge
    • Introducing wildflower areas and a proper mowing regime to increase biodiversity
    • Putting management plans in place
    Flight Farm

    Designs reflect a rigorous understanding of the site and client

    The practice’s design framework originates from Richard’s self-build experience. He developed the design for Crossway using two distinct, parallel processes. Firstly, responding to the client (his wife) meant considering the “mechanics of a plan”. These are things like securing the best views, ensuring low running costs, opening up the house to the south, etc. A client lifestyle analysis is done, including everything from what time they wake up to how often they entertain.

    The other process is analysing how the landscape changes as you approach the plot from different directions, to determine what the house needs to do sculpturally to respond to each of the views. This was something Richard did intuitively with his piece of land: “For me, the context of any site has got rich things for you to respond to. You’ve just got to find them.”

    The design then emerges from these two processes. Crossway’s distinctive arch grew from a desire for the house to sit in amongst the ecology and the biodiversity of the land. And the design for one client project interpreted the qualities of the local flint to respond to the “defining characteristics of the local area”; the building is sharp and crisp outside, like the inside of flint but the white, soft-flowing curves of the courtyard evoke the outside of the stone.

    Crossway

    We need to keep pushing house design forward

    As well as acting as a good training mechanism for architects, Richard has a philosophical argument for protecting Paragraph 79. “If the policy weren’t there, I’d find that quite a sad reflection on where we are with design, where we are as a country with architecture. Look at all these houses going up with no aspirational policy there. I’d find that quite a sad place to be and quite short-sighted.”

    Find out more

    Visit the website of Hawkes Architecture

    Follow Hawkes Architecture on Twitter

    Follow Hawkes Architecture on Facebook

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with Richard Hawkes

    Please connect with me

  • HPH185 : Why engaging in the planning process is so important

    HPH185 : Why engaging in the planning process is so important

    Ben Adam-Smith reviews what it took to be granted planning permission for his new Passivhaus home.

    A recap of the self build journey so far

    After buying a plot of land and hiring our architecture firm Parsons + Whittley, we briefed them on what we would like from our new home.

    We really liked the initial sketches and, through an iterative process, we developed the designs.

    One of the main constraints with our plot is the proximity to the neighbour (because this is effectively a garden plot) and so a lot of time was spent addressing the height of our proposed building.

    Finally we were ready for our planning submission.

     

    Planning applications can be viewed online

    Each local authority has a ‘public access’ planning portal. For example, I had to go through East Herts County Council.

    When you put in an application it will be posted for anyone to see.

    Supporting documents can be included with an application

    Due to the proximity of our plot to the neighbouring dwelling (we are effectively building in their old garden), we needed to demonstrate that there was no loss of amenity.

    So drawings were created to show how our designs compared with the extant consent.

    We also included a Passivhaus verification sheet to show we were serious about meeting the standard.

    Applications can be amended or withdrawn

    The planning process doesn’t have to be a case of submit your designs and wait for the outcome. There is the opportunity to engage with the planners and make it a two way process.

    So if there’s something they don’t like about the scheme, you can look at new solutions or withdraw your application completely.

    By managing the process you are far more likely to have a positive outcome.

     

    It is possible to get more time to address concerns

    For a small project, such as a house build, the planning process typically takes 8 weeks.

    However, it can be possible to get an extension before the final decision is made.

    For example, our planning application was not granted initially because our house was deemed to be ‘oppressive’ to the neighbour. However we were able to submit more evidence to show this was no worse than the extant consent. We also chose to lose our porch and move the house a further 700mm away from the neighbouring property. These alterations were sufficient for our planning application to be granted.

     

    Visual aids add clarity to an application

    Whilst these (such as the comparison drawings above) often take time to create they can be worth their weight in gold.

    Your local planning department is likely to be busy so if you can do anything to save them time and make the arguments ‘visual’ then it will probably be appreciated.

     

    Going to appeal is not as attractive as it sounds

    Any planning decision can be appealed. This generally introduces a 6-month delay. Quite often there may be other options in front of you, before you consider going to appeal.

    If you do appeal, someone independent (from another geographic area) will look at the case again. However, whatever decision they come to is final.

     

    Test your application against policy before submitting

    The application will be decided on planning grounds (unless you’re very unlucky!), so knowing you have thought through all the possible objections before making your application will take you a long way. Hopefully you can deal with them before they turn into an issue.

     

    There is no ‘one size fits all’ when it comes to planning

    Unless you are building on a site like Graven Hill, where the planning has been done upfront and you simply have to adhere to the parameters, the planning constraints of your self build site are a slightly grey area. It takes you being in the process to unravel them one hundred percent (and even then different people may end up with different outcomes).

    For example, there were no set parameters for the height of my own house.

     

    Find out more

    Visit the website of Parsons + Whittley

    Follow Parsons + Whittley on Twitter

    Please connect with me

  • HPH130 : A Passivhaus barn that embraces contextual design – with Lisa Jackson

    HPH130 : A Passivhaus barn that embraces contextual design – with Lisa Jackson

    Planning consultant Lisa Jackson talks us through her Fox Barn Passivhaus self build project.

    Lisa Jackson 4

     

    Interview with Lisa Jackson

    Lisa has been running her planning consultancy business for the last 7 years. She also trained as an assessor for the Code for Sustainable Homes, which is what started her interest in energy efficiency and thinking about building in a different way. Her husband has a background in construction and is a town planner, so their combined skills in sustainability, construction and planning, all proved invaluable when it came to taking on their own self build project.

     

    RICS Red Book was used to get a valuation of the potential plot

    Originally Lisa and her husband had bought the house next door as a DIY project. It was the worst house in the village and they realised they couldn’t afford to develop it the way they hoped, but it was on a really good plot. So they approached their neighbour who agreed to sell half of his plot for them to build their house. Lisa and her husband owned the access and the neighbour owned the frontage. After getting the plot professionally valued via the RICS Red Book it was determined to be a 50/50 split. They came to a formal arrangement, whereby should planning permission be granted the neighbour would give them the option to purchase the land.

    Lisa Jackson 3

     

    Don’t be afraid to revise your planning application

    The house needed to be relatively low key and contextual in terms of design, as it was an infill plot between a thatched cottage and a one and a half storey bungalow, and was replacing a single storey agricultural barn style of building. They achieved planning consent for a 4-bedroom house.

    However, after more research, Lisa and her husband decided they wanted to build to Passivhaus standard. With the help of timber frame specialists Touchwood Homes they were able to adapt the designs relatively easily. They worked on increasing the insulation and reducing the amount of glazing on the north elevation.

    They then submitted a section 73 application with the changes and were issued with a new consent.

    Lisa points out that if you’re looking to buy a plot of land which has already been granted planning consent, you shouldn’t feel coerced into using that design. She says that there’s every opportunity, if it stays within the constraints, to make changes using the section 73 application for the interior and even some of the external features.

    Lisa Jackson 2

     

    “Don’t make a planning application for what you want, make a planning application for what you’ll get consent for”

    This is advice that Lisa gives to her clients. She suggests looking at all the guidance (in terms of conservation areas, village design statements and character studies) and making sure that your application is policy compliant. She thinks it can be easy to get carried away with designing the house that you desperately want to build, but if it doesn’t pay any regard to its context then the application is likely to fail.

    From her own experience as a planning officer, Lisa advises careful consideration of how drawings are presented in the planning application. She often found CAD drawings to not fully reflect how the building would look, have little light and shade, and no feeling of the materials. In comparison, hand drawings would often bring it to life more effectively.

    “So presentation to my mind is everything and winning over the hearts and mind of that planning officer, because that’s what you’ve got to do and they’ve got to love it like you do.”

     

    People want certification if they’re buying a house without radiators!

    Lisa’s decision to go for Passivhaus certification was partly based on being a sensible business decision to enable her to persuade clients to go for certification. Having the certification also helps with the re-sale, because it demonstrates to potential purchasers that while it may not yet be the conventional approach, it actually does work.

    Lisa Jackson 1

     

    Live nearby to your plot during construction

    After selling their old home to release equity to finance the project, they decided to rent a nearby house. Lisa fully recommends that anyone doing their own self build.

    During the construction Lisa’s husband was diagnosed and treated for cancer. As Lisa says, the silver lining was that he was able to spend his recovery period on site project managing the build, which actually aided his recovery and gave her the time to concentrate on running her business.

     

    Certain jobs fall between trade skills

    The house was made from Touchwood Homes’ ‘light and tight’ timber frame which was pre-cut off-site, and insulated with Warmcel recycled newspaper.

    They used a local team of tradespeople who they were very pleased with, but still found that they ended up doing some of the work themselves where certain jobs fell between skills and there was no one else to do it.

     

    A good mortgage broker can really help if you need to re-finance

    During the winter of 2011 they realised that there was a gap in their finances of £60,000. They managed to borrow some of the money from a relative, but also had to extend their mortgage – a process which Lisa says was made more difficult by the providers’ lack of knowledge about what’s involved in the self build process. She does however credit her mortgage broker with being a huge help and making a big difference.

     

    Take professional advice where possible

    When they moved in 3 years ago it still felt like a building site, but completing the landscaping after the first year made a huge difference. Also, creating happy memories in the house turns it more into a home.

    Lisa recommends taking good professional advice where possible and she suggests that if you’re looking for a good planning consultant go through the Royal Town Planning Institute or look at the Planning Portal to see who’s managed to get planning permissions in your area.

    She also feels in hindsight they should have employed the services of a lighting designer, as they slightly over-specified on lighting.

    Above all she thinks you need to be brave and prepared to put in the hard work. She says her husband thinks it took him a couple of years to really recover from the whole experience, however he is already talking about the next one!

    Lisa Jackson

     

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with Lisa Jackson.

     

    Find out more

    Visit the website of Jackson Planning

    Follow Jackson Planning on Instagram

     

    NSBRC Summer Show

    The National Self Build and Renovation Centre are holding their summer show on June 17th to 19th. There will be exhibitors, seminars and a variety of experts and self builders taking part, including Ben Adam-Smith! Ben will be talking at 1pm on Friday 17th June about the Passivhaus standard. Throughout his time on this podcast he has visited over 30 certified Passivhauses and is keen to share the experiences and advice he has been given along the way.

    Following Ben’s talk there will also be a meet-up for Hub members, so he’s looking forward to seeing you there!

     

    Please connect with me