Tag: glazing

  • HPH172 : The impact of setting your energy target – with John Palmer from Enhabit

    HPH172 : The impact of setting your energy target – with John Palmer from Enhabit

    John Palmer from Enhabit explains what happens if you choose not to go all the way to Passivhaus standard, including how this impacts on cost, energy efficiency and comfort. He also outlines a best practice approach if you are going to build with Passivhaus principles.

    Interview with John Palmer

    John is the Managing Director of Enhabit, a company that helps to improve building performance, efficiency and comfort levels. John is a qualified Passivhaus consultant, SAP and BRE Assessor, systems engineer and experienced project manager. Prior to joining Enhabit, he ran his own low energy design consultancy.

    First understand the implications of Passivhaus for your project

    If you are trying to set an energy target, John’s advice is to start by reviewing your plans in line with Passivhaus standards. This will allow you to fully appreciate what it might take to achieve Passivhaus. Once the implications are understood, you may take the necessary steps or make a conscious decision to compromise and aim slightly lower.

    Invest in professional advice at the design stage

    John says that Passivhaus is not so much more complicated than a normal build, it just requires more thought at the beginning. One of the key thermal bridges to eliminate or mitigate is where the ground floor meets external walls, which will require careful detailing and potentially some specialist materials. Paying for some extra time with your architect or Passivhaus consultant is a worthwhile investment.

    When clients commission a design review with Enhabit, they are shown a Passivhaus model of their design and given graduated options to see what’s possible with their house and how close they can get to Passivhaus, with indicative costs for extra requirements.

    Focus on a fabric first approach, not eco technology

    John says it’s easy to get bamboozled by all the technology available. Ground source heat pumps, solar panels, boilers, etc. all have a design life of around 20-25 years and will need to be replaced. However the walls of your building will be there for 80-100 years, so the extra investment you put into them at the start will repay itself time and time again.

    Architectural aspirations may make Passivhaus harder to achieve

    John explains that in Passivhaus terms, the shape of your house is the ratio of your liveable area to outside heat loss area. So you may need to compromise on an ambitious design if you want to target Passivhaus.

    If your plans have already incorporated professional advice, and you intend to follow a very high-performing fabric first approach, it may be you just need to add in a MVHR (mechanical ventilation with heat recovery) system.

    Alternatively you may find you haven’t gone far enough with the fabric of the building and need to change the specification of insulation, glazing, etc. This is typical of retrofits, where John says it’s quite hard to achieve the levels required for Passivhaus with the existing fabric.

    Heating a Passivhaus costs a very small amount

    The annual space heating demand in a Passivhaus should be no more than 15 kilowatt hours per metre squared per year. John comments that this is a very specific number and you may decide this is unachievable.

    The key is to understand what number you can get down to, and what that means. For example, a target of 30 kWh will cost you twice as much to heat your property in any given year than it would have done if it were a Passivhaus. But heating a Passivhaus costs very little, so doubling very little isn’t that much and is likely to be better than other new build properties in the UK.

    Every design decision will impact on comfort levels

    Doubling your space heating demand to 30 kWh will impact on comfort but the nature of this impact will depend on why you haven’t achieved the Passivhaus target of 15 kWh. John gives a few examples:

    IssueImplicationsImpact On Comfort
    Insufficient insulation in wallsHeat loss from wallsFeeling cold off the walls
    Poor detailing where walls meet ground floorThermal bridgingIf bad, noticeable cold spots and possible condensation/mould
    Window specification isn’t triple/ high-quality double glazingCold will radiate off the glazingFeeling cold in rooms at certain times of year

    Thermal comfort is all about constant temperatures

    Many homes, especially Victorian buildings, tend to have rooms that are hot near the ceilings but cold at lower levels due to drafts and a lack of insulation below the ground floor. John explains that although the average air temperature in the room might be ok, having cold feet and a hot head will feel uncomfortable! Paying attention to thermal bridges and insulation will help to achieve what John calls good temperature stratification.

    Building regulations rely on people opening windows for required ventilation

    Although our awareness of temperature is quite good, it’s harder to detect poor air quality. We may notice smells and detect when rooms are a bit stuffy, but that’s about it.

    Humidity, VOCs (volatile organic compounds), odours and nitrogen oxide levels are all examples of pollutants within buildings. John advises we need about 30 cubic metres of fresh air per person per hour moving through a property to deal with pollutants, but this isn’t achievable with trickle vents and extractor fans unless you start opening windows.

    An MVHR system will deliver the required level of ventilation, but there are other mechanisms out there superior to extractor fans that will give extra ventilation but perhaps not cost as much.

    Insulation, glazing and ventilation will cost more, but not much more

    These three aspects are typically more expensive than a normal new build, as a Passivhaus requires:

    • More insulation – but you’ll only be paying more for materials (approx. 0.5% increase on overall cost); the labour costs are the same
    • Triple glazing, for thermal performance and to avoid condensation and mould – the gap is closing between triple and double glazing prices
    • An MVHR system – for an average sized house this may cost £9-10k for supply and installation

    Of these, the greatest return on investment will be insulation.

    Some builders are willing to learn

    Hiring the right people to build a Passivhaus is another factor to consider. Although it’s still relatively new to the UK, John has found that builders relish the challenge of doing something that requires more detail and thought; they appreciate the ability to measure how well they’ve done, and revel in achieving the standard. He adds, “You have big, hairy builders hugging each other on site when they get their final air test and they’ve got down to the right levels.”

    Five helpful tips from John

    1) Visit a Passivhaus or speak to someone who lives in one, to see what it can deliver from a living experience

    2) Find out what would be involved in achieving Passivhaus for your project

    3) Understand how each decision affects the final design, floor space, efficiency and comfort

    4) Put an MVHR system in, regardless of your airtightness target; ventilation and air quality are worth doing as standalone

    5) Have some form of quality control in place, even if you’re not targeting Passivhaus, to get the results you’re expecting

    Find out more

    Passivhaus Trust

     

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with John Palmer

    Please connect with us

    Subscribe, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow Ben Adam-Smith on Bluesky

  • HPH111 : How value engineering could benefit a house build – with Nick Grant from Elemental Solutions

    HPH111 : How value engineering could benefit a house build – with Nick Grant from Elemental Solutions

    Nick Grant of Elemental Solutions explains what is meant by value engineering and how it can be used in the house building process.

    DSC_0091

     

    Interview with Nick Grant

    Nick was a Trustee of the AECB and is Technical Director of the Passivhaus Trust. He is a sustainable building consultant with a background in engineering and, stemming from a childhood ‘make do and mend’ mentality, a lifelong passion for doing more with less.

     

    Giving maximum value through engineering

    As an engineer, one of the modules that most inspired Nick was one about value engineering.

    Value is defined by Nick as being performance divided by cost. If you maximise performance, or reduce cost, it increases value.

    Nick cites as an example the trend of smartphones having fewer buttons than ever before. An iPhone has been very value engineered in that “it manages to deliver a lot by doing very little and it takes a lot of effort to get to that”.

    In engineering it’s an incredibly positive thing and what is strived for, however when Nick started working in the construction industry he discovered that people were using the term to mean cost-cutting in a negative sense:

    “So I went from this thing being something I thought was inherently a great thing and a real challenge and exciting, and for me defined really good design, to this thing that people say “it’s been value engineered, they’ve ruined my project, they value engineered it.”

     

    Value engineering has to happen at the beginning of a project

    It needs to happen right at the start when the design is being developed. Decisions about the size, shape, orientation, etc all have an impact on the final value, cost and challenges that are going to arise. If the correct steps haven’t been taken at the beginning then it is likely that contracts in the tender will come back over budget, resulting in a cost-cutting exercise which will inevitably see the removal of features that you liked about the design.

    Dempsey Decourcy Architects - Vowchurch
    Dempsey Decourcy Architects – Vowchurch

     

    It should be integrated in the house building process

    Nick feels that everything he does is value engineering, but that people can be reluctant to pay for something which leaves them feeling like they’re actually getting less. It may be that they’ve been told about something which they didn’t need to do, thus saving money, but they haven’t actually got anything tangible for it.

    Typically in architecture it tends to be cost cutting and might be carried out by a Quantity Surveyor. Nick feels however that it should be completely integrated, with everyone on board and led by the lead designer. There should be encouragement, whether for the structural engineer, landscape architect, energy consultant etc, to find better, cheaper and easier ways of doing things.

    Example of VE interior detail - polished concrete floor / foundations
    Example of VE interior detail – polished concrete floor / foundations

     

    Example of VE interior detail - Kitchen cupboards made of shuttering ply and surplus stainless steel washers
    Example of VE interior detail – Kitchen cupboards made of shuttering ply and surplus stainless steel washers

     

    Having constraints on a project can be a positive

    Nick says that rather than having to make compromises if they’ve run out of time or budget, it should be the case that if the correct work has been put in during the process they should be able to come to something “where it kind of all works.”

    Having constraints can in some ways make the job easier. There can be fewer choices needing to be made and subsequently less things that they can get wrong. It can free the designer to focus on other things as well.

    “So the more constraints we have, I think as a designer I take that as, I like that. So if we’ve got a very small budget, limited palate of materials, I quite like the challenge of that.”

    By establishing a budget early on you can immediately realise that there are things that might not need to be considered, such as the indoor swimming pool and fancy finishes!

    Dempsey Decourcy Architects - Cae Duff
    Dempsey Decourcy Architects – Cae Duff

    “So you’ve got to do the value engineering, you’ve got to find a better way of doing things, find more clever materials, but you’ve got to also set a budget and then work to that budget. Otherwise everything will just expand to meet it.”

     

    You can do things cheaply, quickly or well: you can’t do all three!

    Nick and his partner designed and built their own home, blowing their original £30,000 budget and spending £40,000! While they like to think they did it well and cheaply, it did take them a long time to complete. They took inspiration from Christopher Alexander’s book A Pattern Language, but by doing that they did end up with a house that has a very complex form (a form factor of around 5) and which was a lot more time consuming to build.

    1

    3

    4

     

    It’s not easy to do simple!

    By working on repeat projects Nick has been able to invest the time into working out details that appear to be simple, but if they were that easy everyone would be doing them! The process can evolve very slowly but benefits are reaped by the experience gained, thus making things easier on the next projects.

    Dempsey_Decourcy Cae Duff 2
    Dempsey Decourcy Architects – Cae Duff

     

    Give a great deal of thought about the number and function of windows being used

    Nick is currently doing some work on overheating for the Passivhaus Trust. He explains that in our climate we tend to want to let the sunlight in and aren’t used to going out and putting the shutters down, whereas in warmer climes this is something people do automatically. It therefore shouldn’t be a surprise when we return home and find them overheating!

    So firstly it’s important to have enough glass for views and letting daylight in, but without having too much.

    8

    Glazing is expensive so, coming back to value engineering, make the window do as much work for you as possible. Thinking of function, if there are windows that can’t easily be accessed and opened, then consider a fixed rather than openable one, which typically you could pay 30% less for.

    Nick gives this example of his own window behind the kitchen sink which they can’t easily reach to open, and suggests that actually a fixed, single frame view would probably have been better.

    DSC_0080

    Have a guess what percentage of glass there is to frame, and find out the answer in the podcast. The answer may surprise you!
    Have a guess what percentage of glass there is to frame, and find out the answer in the podcast. The answer may surprise you!

    Ensure also that if your windows are to open, that they open enough to get the airflows. Often they open in a restricted reveal which doesn’t allow enough air in. Evolving over many buildings, Nick has learned to step the reveals in a way that when the window is tilted it still allows good airflow. It’s this repetition, and going back to review previous jobs, that is critical to learning and making improvements next time.

     

    Decide what matters and work to your budget

    Deciding what matters and working to your budget is Nick’s key piece of advice.

    “Everything isn’t possible. But again that shouldn’t mean there’s a compromise necessarily. What you end up with you shouldn’t be thinking oh I really miss the little Victorian fake windows, you should think oh thank God I didn’t do that!”

     

    Find out more

    Follow Nick Grant on Twitter

    Find out more about Elemental Solutions

    View Nick’s presentation: Value Engineering, What’s not to love?

    Find out more about Charles Grylls and Dempsey Decourcy Architects

     

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with Nick Grant.

     

    Inquiry into the Quality of New Build Housing in England

    Towards the end of last year, Ben was part of a panel at the Inquiry into the Quality of New Build Housing in England, at the Houses of Parliament. Presenting to a handful of politicians and construction professionals, those contributing included:

    • Phil Waller, who has previously worked for a major house builder. His opinion was that they could be doing much better, and he has set up a website to try and advise potential purchasers what they should be looking for if they’re intending to buy from a developer.
    • Geoff Peter from Wingrove Law is a solicitor who represents owners of new builds who have ongoing issues with their homes.

    We know what a lot of the issues are and a lot of good questions were being asked, but it just comes down to whether anything will actually get done.

     

    Please connect with me