Tag: Charlie Luxton Design

  • HPH251 : Adopting a ‘do less, but better’ mentality for your house build – with Charlie Luxton

    HPH251 : Adopting a ‘do less, but better’ mentality for your house build – with Charlie Luxton

    Charlie Luxton shares lessons he’s learnt from visiting projects on Building The Dream, running an architectural practice and completing his own self build.

    Interview with Charlie Luxton

    With a childhood spent building treehouses and dens from straw bales and pallets, it was perhaps no surprise that Charlie Luxton entered into a career in architecture.

    Having traveled widely, his eyes were opened to how people lived and how the world was changing, and he found himself questioning the way things were done. Although it wasn’t taught at university, by his second year of study he had developed his lasting passion for sustainability in architecture.

    Do less, but better

    This is the principle that Charlie tries to instill at his practice. With the process of building a house having so much embodied energy, he believes there’s a real responsibility to do it well and make sure that it’s going to last a long time. It’s not about making it as big as you can build, but it might mean making it a bit smaller, but making it better.

    “If you build well and you build sustainably, you will enjoy the space so much more. Because well-designed and well-built, a small house can be just as successful and provide as much usable space as a badly designed large house.”

    He explains that often people will plan to build extra bedrooms that they don’t really need. And statistically with people that self build staying there for around 20 years, effectively they’re building in what someone else might want in 20 years time, not what they need for living in it themselves.

    Charlie believes that if the architecture and the build quality are right, then a future sale price will reflect that, and there are bound to be purchasers who will want the house that you designed as being right for yourselves at that time.

    You’re only really ready to do your first self build, after you’ve done your first self build!

    While people building a house can be very good at researching what things they are going to buy to put in it, they can often fail to research and understand what kind of house they want to live in and how they want it to feel.

    Pay for quality of design

    Charlie regularly meets people who haven’t been prepared to spend enough money on good design, but by visiting a well designed, sustainable home it can help them bring value to their project.

    “If people did more research about the varied outcomes of people working with really good design specialists or without them, they would find it much easier to justify the expenditure of a design professional. And I think they would see that the outcomes are noticeably better.”

    He elaborates on the importance of finding the right designer, not necessarily a local one. He says many can just be going through the motions of designing the same old thing, without looking at context, the specifics of the brief, the specifics of the site or even orientation to the sun.

    By visiting a couple of homes they have designed, and that are similar, you can get a good indication of how your own house might feel.

    Although getting a good designer on board may come at a premium, it can be as a result of the hours spent detailing to get it right.

    “But if the person you’re paying is designing your building and dictating every single element that goes into that building and how they come together, surely it’s some of the most important money you’re going to spend.”

    He was a terrible client on his own self build!

    Charlie moved to his current location 12 years ago, buying a thatched cottage with an outbuilding that had conversion potential and just under an acre of land. Wanting more accommodation and office space, but knowing they wouldn’t get permission to extend the cottage, they decided to knock down the outbuilding and build a new home.

    It took three iterations to get to planning, and then a further two redesigns to come up with the final approved designs. Original approval was for a two storey building, but Charlie changed this to a single storey dwelling with a vegetable garden on the roof, where he would still be able to chat to the neighbours!

    Because of the nature of his work, Charlie admits he put a lot of pressure on himself to come up with something “better than good”.

    Overheating was his main concern

    The brief was for a low-energy, sustainable family home, with the elements of Passivhaus but without getting it certified.

    “I don’t think you can ignore architecture and just focus solely on the environment. Because if a building is really good architecturally and ninety-five percent as good as a full passive building, to me that’s got real validity. And I think there are always choices to be made about why you’re putting in a window for a view or for overheating or for heat loss.

    So, it’s a hugely complicated thing. And I’m not saying we’ve got it right and we always have to be refocusing our efforts. That’s what is brilliant about Passivhaus. It gives you that standard, that gate, yes or no. Are you in or out? As soon as you’re not doing it, it’s a bit more vague and you can start to abuse that or drift away from the purity.”

    In hindsight, Charlie says he should have modeled it in PHPP, as his greatest concern at the time was overheating.

    From Homebuilding & Renovating’s YouTube channel

    With one side being dug into a hillside, they wanted a lot of glazing on the other to make the connection with the landscape, and have also used rooflights. They have used an active control system with external louvering to counter any overheating issues.

    The bungalow is connected to the cottage via a highly insulated district heating main, with rainwater harvesting coming down, and heating able to go back and forth.

    It was around ten years ago that they refurbished the main cottage and they were determined to do it as sustainably as possible.

    They added wood fibre and lime internal insulation, dug out the floors and put in 200mm of insulation underneath, insulated under the thatch, and installed a rainwater harvesting system. They used only European hardwoods which mostly came from trees in Scotland that were old or diseased and would be felled anyway. The cottage is now used as their office.

    Build your own and learn from your mistakes

    Charlie would encourage anyone who is an architectural professional to try building their own house, for their own learning progression, or at least do proper post-occupancy analysis, which he sees there being a real lack of in the industry.

    Planning constraints dictated the build system

    Planning constraints meant the bungalow needed to be be built into the hillside, which inevitably meant a reinforced concrete build system.

    The structural engineer calculations worked out that the force onto the back of the entire wall was equivalent to three tonnes per square metre. That also meant a thick floor slab and concrete again to hold the 200mm wildflower roof.

    The external walls are 140mm concrete block on the inside with a timber I-beam, and blown with a high-performing polystyrene bead.

    They used granulated ground blast furnace slag, which reduces the amount of concrete and CO2. To further try and compensate for the amount of concrete used, they have underfloor heating and the concrete is the floor finish.

    “We’re using the concrete block a) to give a rigidity, a sturdiness to the walls; b) to give that thermal mass so we can iron out any temperature fluctuations with a thermally massive building. So, that’s how you try to make what is on one level a problem, using so much concrete, into something of a strength.”

    Using local materials was important

    Inspiration for the building came from the railway viaduct piers that they look out towards. They were able to use local stone from a quarry just three and a half miles away, and Corten as a reference to the local steel industry. Charlie admits that his other inspiration for the outside of the building was less conventional, being from the railway bridges around the M25!

    Management of the job was the biggest challenge

    He explains that he does architecture and TV and is no builder, but he took on the role of principal contractor. Apart from a few bags of sand and cement he actually did all the purchasing himself, which took a huge amount of time.

    He also cites a particularly trying time as being when there was a mistake with the plastering. Until that point everything had being going well, but it came at the time they were exhausted, and running out of money and emotional strength.

    From Homebuilding & Renovating’s YouTube channel

    Today’s overinvestment is tomorrow’s bargain

    Charlie believes if possible it’s best not to take a short-term view of what you should invest. With build costs outstripping inflation significantly, if you end up going further and spending more than you intended, then it will still be cheaper than if you did it in ten or fifteen years’ time.

    “So, actually if you do it right now, you won’t go back and redo it. So, a) you save wasted materials of going back and redoing something; and b) you save the cost uplift that’s likely to happen.”

    The other thing he learnt was, in the search for perfection the one thing you’re bound to find is insanity.

    “I think trying to finish this house, you’ve got to let things go. You’ve got to be proportionate. And I think a lot of people really struggle with that. I think if you accept early on that it’s never going to be perfect, as much as I’m not perfect, no-one I know is perfect, then I think you’ll find it a much easier ride.”

    Don’t be afraid to use specialists

    Charlie’s advice would be to spend time really working out your cost plan early on. He used his quantity surveyor’s spreadsheet of costs to then populate and amend figures himself, and found this to be a useful guide to understand where he was going. He believes people often kid themselves about the real cost of things, and if they knew the real cost they would never do it.

    He suggests tendering for items early on and also going to specialist suppliers. They might appear to be more expensive but they’ll also be a lot less hassle. With the expertise of doing their one thing day in and day out they can often be very quick and good value in hindsight.

    Find out more

    Visit the website of Charlie Luxton Design

    Follow Charlie on Twitter

    Transcript

    Please connect with me

    Subscribe, rate and review the podcast in iTunes

    Rate and review the podcast on Stitcher

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow us on Twitter

  • HPH113 : Budgeting for our eco home – with Tara Murphy and Dimitri Daras

    HPH113 : Budgeting for our eco home – with Tara Murphy and Dimitri Daras

    Tara Murphy and Dimitri Daras talk us through their Gloucestershire self build project, with a focus on how they managed their budget.

     

    Interview with Tara Murphy and Dimitri Daras

    After selling their London flat and moving west, Tara and Dimitri were uninspired by the quality and value for money of houses for sale and made the decision to self build.

    With a budget of £350,000 they built ‘The Cut’, a two storey low energy home.

    Their finished house also featured on the TV programme ‘Building the Dream’, which was presented by their architectural designer, Charlie Luxton.

    Tara Murphy's house, The Cut, Stroud, Glos
    Charlie Luxton Design

    Leave a realistic amount of your budget for the build costs!

    Tara spent a year searching for a plot in the Gloucestershire region, and during that time was able to build up good knowledge of what was a fair price to pay for land. Deciding how much they were prepared to allocate for a plot determined how much of their budget they would have left for their build. Plots around the £80,000 / £90,000 mark tended to be in locations that didn’t appeal, and those available at closer to £200,000 they knew wouldn’t leave a realistic amount to build their home.

    Their search concentrated on plots (and buildings that could be demolished) in the region of £150,000. The plot they purchased was being offered at £175,000 and they managed to buy it for £162,500, which Tara considers to be a fair price. Unusually there was no competition for the plot, and they were delighted that they had found somewhere within their budget that had the amazing views, space for a good-sized garden, house and car parking that they had been looking for. They had thought they may have to compromise.

    Day 1_panorama

     

    House plans were needed to get the mortgage

    Arranging the mortgage turned out to be a frustrating, risky and expensive process. Even using mortgage products designed for the self build market, they found it challenging. The mortgage company wouldn’t lend money without plans, so Tara and Dimitri had to employ someone to design the building before they even owned the land. They put the offer in for the land in the July but it took until the following January for the mortgage to be approved and the land purchase to go through. During that period they had spent around £20,000 on the project and were living with the risk that the vendor could walk away at any time.

    “The whole system, even within the self build mortgage industry, seems to be set up for developers. You have to have a big big pillow of cash in order to get this process started. If you’re like us, instead of buying a normal house you just want to have a go at building a house, it’s not helpful.”

     

    Select an architect that you will be able to communicate effectively with

    Tara and Dimitri knew they wanted to build a contemporary home, so looked at portfolios on the websites of local architects. Another consideration was that they were interested in Passivhaus design and were keen to find an architect with knowledge and ideas around that. Drawing up a shortlist of four, Tara was struck by a comment that the architectural designer Charlie Luxton had made that, whoever they chose, they needed to make sure it would be someone they could be honest and have robust conversations with. They selected Charlie Luxton Design as they liked Charlie’s design work, enthusiasm and interest in Passivhaus principles. They also felt that by visiting so many other projects for his TV work, the extra experience could only benefit their own build.

     

    Keeping the form simple kept the build within budget

    The final design didn’t change too much from the original sketches. The only things that were really affected by the budget were the flat roof which was selected partly because it was a cheaper option than others, and the living room windows which they had wanted to be able to throw open completely, but were going to be far too expensive. Their original plan to use locally sourced materials also had to be reconsidered when they discovered how much the Cotswold stone was going to cost!

    The form of the building was kept very simple to maximise the volume and to work within their budget. Costs were also kept down on their internal features and by using lots of plywood finishes around the house.

    By opting for a minimal design they have not had to spend money on architraves and skirting, and they didn’t have to spend money on expensive flooring where they were able to power float the concrete slab instead.

    The architectural designer and builder worked together to design the building structure which they were able to make more economically than using a timber frame company.

    IMG_1250_4

     

    Additional groundworks had a large impact on costs

    While the careful design and spending on the house fabric came in on budget, their finances were impacted by unexpected groundworks costs. They had originally allocated £5,000 for these as preliminary works had already been carried out by a previous owner.

    When they came to excavating into the hill they hit huge chunks of rock which was when they discovered that it was actually an old quarry site. Removing this rock destabilised the bank and resulted in considerably more work and money to make it safe. Together with a higher than anticipated electricity connection cost, they were around £40,000 over where they had expected to be.

    IMG_4513

    IMG_4881

    They applied for more money through the mortgage to cover these costs and had to forego plans for a car port / garage area. When it came to making savings to the house, they felt that the design and finishes were already quite simple and struggled to see where they could reduce costs.

    Charlie Luxton Design
    Charlie Luxton Design

    Charlie Luxton Design
    Charlie Luxton Design

    Charlie Luxton Design
    Charlie Luxton Design

    “There were so many other costs associated that it didn’t make sense to change anything really in the design.”

     

    Budget – lessons learned

    Dimitri’s philosophy was to work out what was fundamental and non-negotiable and to accept that it costs what it costs. Their builder dealt with the budget spreadsheets so was able to let Tara know how much she had available for which areas, and she did the best she could with the budget she had.

    Tara advises always getting lots of quotes in order to get the best deal. She also recommends keeping on top of hours worked by the contractor and what sort of costs they’ve accrued, to save an unexpected, uncomfortable and expensive situation at the end when they could present their final invoice considerably higher than their estimate.

    Charlie Luxton Design
    Charlie Luxton Design

    Charlie Luxton Design
    Charlie Luxton Design

     

    Find out more

    Read Tara’s blog

     

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with Tara Murphy and Dimitri Daras.

     

    The Hub update

    Continuing on our podcast theme, our latest module in The Hub is all about finance. We’re trying to address the core issues and look at typical ways that you might fund a project. We examine how self build mortgages work, what you should do if you have assets, and under what circumstances bridging loans might be an option.

    And in a new video episode of the Long Barrow Passivhaus build, we’re following the raft foundation stage: pouring the concrete and finding out why there’s so much steel in the foundation.

     

    Link to RIBA Article

    Adam Vaughan from Tracing Green very kindly forwarded us this RIBA article – ‘Self build shows no sign of taking off‘, which starts:

    “Despite years of championing by successive housing ministers, self build activity has yet to show any signs of picking up and making an impact on housing delivery.”

    If you’re someone that has decided that self build is not for you then please contact us as we’d love to know what happened and why. What is the barrier that is stopping you? Is it finance, finding land or something completely different?

     

    Please connect with me