Tag: CAT

  • HPH158 : Lessons from 40 years at the Centre for Alternative Technology – with Pat Borer

    HPH158 : Lessons from 40 years at the Centre for Alternative Technology – with Pat Borer

    Architect and author Pat Borer shares insights from his teaching career at the Centre for Alternative Technology as well as what he’s learned from his own practice (which has helped hundreds of self-builders).

    Interview with Pat Borer

    Pat Borer is an architect specialising in green architecture, mostly for self-builders. His work at the Centre for Alternative Technology (CAT) in Machynlleth began in 1976.

    CAT’s inspirational natural setting helps its cause

    CAT was founded in 1973 by Gerard Morgan-Grenville on the site of an old slate quarry in west Wales. He wanted to create an experimental village of the future to demonstrate there was an alternative to mainstream, industrialised civilisation, both technologically and socially. Demand to visit the centre in its stunning location meant it was soon opened to the public.

    Straw bale theatre

    We should only use our fair share of resources

    The industrialised people of the world use eight times their “fair share”. The energy crisis of the 1970s prompted research into renewables by many, including CAT, although interest in renewable energy has developed hugely and is now generated on a national scale. In 1976, CAT built a super insulated house that used less energy than a passive house.

    Photovoltaic technology hasn’t changed much but the scale of manufacturing means the cost continues to drop. Similarly, the cost of generating electricity from wind turbines is now comparable with coal and even gas.

    The construction sector uses a tenth of the nation’s energy

    Pat comments that one reason the UK has such a big DIY market is because our houses are so badly designed and built that we have to do something about it. Unfortunately, by the time a typical development house is occupied it is difficult to rectify the corners that have been cut such as insufficient insulation.

    CAT advocates green building, covering many areas relevant to self-builders:

    • Energy
    • Architecture
    • Light
    • Air quality
    • Materials
    • Building waste

    The philosophy behind all CAT buildings is low energy, including low embodied energy and materials. Visitors can sense the difference in these buildings because of the use of traditional materials such as wood, earth and lime. They say it smells and feels different, which feels good.

    Rammed earth theatre

    The technology works; what needs to change is attitudes

    CAT is known for its research and most recently their Zero Carbon Britain report prompted questions in parliament. Pat explains that to get to a zero-carbon state, we’ve got to make some serious changes like reducing flying and meat consumption.

    CAT also plays a key educational role, offering:

    The five-day self-build course runs twice a year for groups of around 16 people, and covers a mixture of theory and practice. It includes talks on energy, materials, services, organising the site, planning and building regulations. The course encourages people to think beyond their intuitive design ideas and ask themselves what is sustainable.

    Timber frame is the most applicable method for self-build projects

    CAT only teaches timber frame construction to self-builders. There are various advantages: the techniques are relatively easy and timber is plentiful, durable, strong and easy to cut. Local timber has very low embodied energy and provides work for people in the countryside as well as good habitats for wildlife.

    Timber frame construction helps self-builders gain confidence and Pat has seen many go on to tackle plastering and some plumbing and electrics.

    However, his tip for a successful project is to choose the technologies that suit you. If you’re good at brickwork then it’s okay to choose that; it’s a cheap way to build and can be suitable for low energy houses.

    Choose your insulation wisely: condensation can rot a timber frame

    The evidence for using breathable construction is very strong although it’s still not universally adopted, despite the well-known risk of condensation. CAT promotes the use of insulations made from recycled newsprint, cellulose, sheep’s wool, flax, hemp, and cork – rather than plastic foams. Sheep’s wool, for example, smells great, doesn’t itch and is easy to fit.

    Is green building always more expensive?

    Pat argues that although many sustainable materials can be more expensive, there are cost-effective options. For example, reusing materials is often cheaper. In other cases, for the same budget one might choose a superior and more environmentally friendly product, e.g. a locally grown hardwood floor rather than a “glued-up” laminate from Germany.

    Saving energy doesn’t have to mean discomfort

    Pat explains that the centre has survived on very little money but it’s never been uncomfortable, as practices such as car and food sharing have made it very cheap to live and work there. CAT tries to show that it’s not just the right thing to do, it’s an attractive way to live.

    “If everybody does a little, we’ll only achieve a little.”

    Regarding climate change, Pat quotes David McKay, explaining we’re past the point where small changes by everyone are enough. We need to do more.

    CAT aims to show visitors that ecology is complex, with every little thing affecting every other thing, challenging them to really change their lifestyle with regard to energy. Beyond changing light bulbs and saving water are more demanding adjustments such as an electric car or sacrificing space or aesthetics for insulation.

    The best solutions are not technological nor lifestyle

    Pat says in the future the Industrial Revolution and its enormous fossil fuel use will be seen as a wrong turning. So we need to start correcting our course now, but building on what we’ve done.

    We are often reminded that if most of the fossil fuels aren’t left in the ground, life will become untenable for most of the world. Remembering this while planning a self-build will yield a better result at the end, as Pat says: “As well as saving the planet, you’ve kind of saved yourself a bit.”

    Find out more

    Visit the website of Pat Borer

    Visit the website of the Centre for Alternative Technology

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with Pat Borer

    The Hub update

    Please connect with me

  • HPH149 : Can airtightness tests on developer homes be trusted? – with Paul Buckingham of Sustainable Lifestyles

    HPH149 : Can airtightness tests on developer homes be trusted? – with Paul Buckingham of Sustainable Lifestyles

    Paul Buckingham explains his frustrations about building standards in volume built houses.

    20160926_095744

     

    Interview with Paul Buckingham

    In Episode 99 we spoke to Luke Mahon about what it had been like living in his new, developer built, home. In this episode we are turning attention to the insights of someone who has worked within the industry and has been frustrated by the practices he has routinely seen.

    Paul Buckingham is a trained electrician but his interest in the energy efficiency of buildings led him to complete a Masters degree in Architecture: Advanced Environmental and Energy Studies at the Centre for Alternative Technology (CAT). Over the last 4 or 5 years his work has predominantly been in airtightness testing, and estimates in that time he must have carried out tests on over 2000 properties, of which he says none of them were properly airtight. Until recently much of the work he did was on volume built houses and he shares some of his experiences of that time.

    Paul now runs an independent consultancy, providing advice on achieving energy efficiency.

    thermal-camera

     

    The airtightness testing is about making the house pass the test, not about making it energy efficient

    Paul claims that his experience of testing was about quantity and not quality, getting as many houses to pass the test as possible.

    “All you’re doing is effectively bodging to get it through an air test…. And it doesn’t matter how good or how bad the building is, it will pass eventually.”

    He uses the example of dry lining which should be solid dab and fully sealed around the tops, bottoms, electrical outlets etc, but invariably the builders are not using anywhere near enough plaster. After the boards have been put up on the walls this can be spotted with a thermal camera to see where the dots and dabs are.

    Paul tells of a house he visited where the building failed the airtightness test because of a lack of mastic around the skirtings. He says the builders then put in the mastic, only for the carpet fitters to cut it out again. After it was then replaced by the builders and subsequently passed the airtightness test, Paul noticed them once again cutting it out as he was preparing to leave.

    “So they’ll go round, they’ll mastic it purely to get it through an air test but it does look a bit messy because they go in there, they literally just throw this stuff on there just to seal the skirtings up so they can get an air test pass on it. And once we’ve finished they come in and cut it all out again. It happens on pretty much every house I’ve ever been to.”

    Cold air flowing behind the  dry lining of a new house where it has not been sealed to specification.
    Cold air flowing behind the dry lining of a new house where it has not been sealed to specification.
    Wind blowing through the eaves and across the ceiling of a brand new loft conversion.
    Wind blowing through the eaves and across the ceiling of a brand new loft conversion.

     

    Some builders were prepared to take advice onboard

    Paul says there was a often a shortfall in knowledge on site about what airtightness is and how to make a house airtight, and it was his aim to advise people how to improve on this, rather than just get the buildings to pass the test. He found some site managers and builders more receptive than others to his suggestions and they were prepared to work with him to get the houses built right, rather than patching them up at the end.

     

    The tight schedules mean quality is often not a consideration

    On a large housing development the builders are given such tight schedules that Paul claims the builders themselves say they’re just throwing the houses up in order to meet deadlines and targets.

    “And when the guys that are building them turn round and say I wouldn’t buy one, then there’s something seriously wrong somewhere.”

    Loft space of a new house showing insulation that has fallen out because it wasn't installed to manufacturer's specification.
    Loft space of a new house showing insulation that has fallen out because it wasn’t installed to manufacturer’s specification.
    Absence of loft insulation on a new build house.
    Absence of loft insulation on a new build house.

    Paul was eventually fired from his recent airtightness testing job. He says his employers weren’t happy that he was spending time trying to get the message across and get the builders to change their ways, when he should have been keeping the customers (the volume house builders) happy by helping them to just get a pass on the buildings. Things came to a head after he wrote a report where he had used thermography to show missing insulation, air leakage around windows and air blowing in behind the plaster board.

    “But I think had they not sacked me I would have quit anyway because I got to the point where I just couldn’t do it anymore. I just felt like a total fraud.”

     

    Use an independent surveyor or airtightness tester if you’re planning to buy one of these homes

    Paul points out that when it comes to the airtightness test, “the trouble is the builder pays for it so the builders effectively own the compliance companies.” He suggests that if it was instead carried out by an independent tester or surveyor, and paid for by the potential purchaser, you could be sure of a more impartial result. He says this might be a step in the right direction of putting pressure on the builders to improve standards and practices. He would also like to see a tightening up of legislation, where things adhere to the Building Regulations to the letter, not just an interpretation of them which is what he currently sees.

    “I know how we can make energy efficient houses, it’s just that none of the main builders seem to be doing it. They just seem to be throwing up boxes and selling them. If I could work with these builders and advise them on how they can make them properly energy efficient then yes I think I’d be quite happy with that but at the moment I’m not seeing any of that!”

     

    Find out more

    Visit the Sustainable Lifestyles website

    Follow Paul on Twitter

     

    Transcript

    Download a transcript of the interview with Paul Buckingham.

     

    The Big Green Home Show – National Self Build and Renovation Centre

    A reminder that Ben will be speaking at The Big Green Home Show at the National Self Build and Renovation Centre on 8th and 9th October. He’ll be talking on the topic of what it’s like to be a self builder. He’ll be drawing on his self build experiences so far, some of the challenges that you might face, and also offering some of the tips that he has picked up from visiting a number of Passivhaus self builds across the UK.

     

    Please connect with me