Tag: Cambridge Architectural Research

  • HPH248 : The benefits of joining a cohousing development – with Jan Chadwick

    HPH248 : The benefits of joining a cohousing development – with Jan Chadwick

    Resident of Marmalade Lane cohousing, Jan Chadwick, explains why living in a multi-generational community is so important to her.

    Interview with Jan Chadwick

    Jan Chadwick and her husband became interested in cohousing after reading a newspaper article in 2013 about the benefits of community as you get older.

    After carrying out some research and staying with a cohousing group in Stroud for an immersion weekend, they decided that their current lifestyle and location wouldn’t provide them with enough of a sense of community as they moved into older age.

    It’s about being neighbourly, not about providing care

    For Jan, it wasn’t about living in a community that would provide care as they got older, but one that would provide neighbourliness. With plenty of research showing that people who are engaged with a community can stay ‘younger’ for longer, as they are more active mentally and physically, Jan and her husband knew this was the way they wanted to live.

    They were happy to relocate to find the right project

    With the K1 Cambridgeshire project they were encouraged that the land had already been purchased and there seemed an active way forward to making the idea a reality.

    Our podcast with Chris Wilson of the K1 cohousing group explains how the scheme was set up.

    “We’ve broken a lot of moulds – and the design guidance!”

    The site has a belt of mature trees that they and the planners wanted to retain, so this was an element of the design layout that didn’t change. The rest of the design went through a long process of changes at various stages until they reached the final layout which enhances community, the environment and offers the southern open aspect that they wanted for energy performance.

    A multi-agency project

    There have been lots of different groups involved in bringing the scheme to fruition. Initially there was a relationship between the cohousing group, Cambridgeshire Cohousing Limited, and the City Council, with the City Council helping to get the project started, and initially providing the payment for their project manager.

    They then applied for money from the Homes and Communities Agency to work out their client brief, which they did over a number of workshops with Jim Ross and his team at Cambridge Architectural Research.

    With their 60 page brief they were able to work again with the council to develop a tender for a developer. The group were heavily involved in the tender process, ensuring they would get the quality they wanted for the building of the houses and environment.

    Their chosen developer, TOWN, created a consortium with Trivselhus, a large Swedish housebuilder. They worked with Mole Architects to develop the design and tick the boxes required by South Cambridgeshire District Planning Authority.

    The transport links make it an ideal location for the residents

    The site is well located for public transport, with the new North Cambridge railway station just a bike ride away. It is also on the guided bus route which leads into the centre of Cambridge, and is right next to the A14.

    Each property has one parking space, and a quarter share of a visitor parking space. And, being Cambridge, they also have 146 bike spaces!

    It is a multi-generational cohousing development

    Creating a multi-generational development was a key requirement of the group, and as such, they have properties sized from one to five bedrooms. It was also important for enabling residents to have the opportunity to upsize or downsize within the development later on.

    The original members were able to configure the design for their particular property, with the remaining unsold properties being configured by Mole Architects.

    With 42 properties on the site, there will likely be over 100 people on site when fully sold, so it was important that the facilities will accommodate the growing numbers.

    They wanted a garden they could use as productive land, a wild space for growing, a common house where they could interact with the community and quiet rooms for retreat.

    There are also three bedrooms in the common house that can be used by guests.

    Many of the properties are future-proofed

    The properties are built to a standard developed by Trivselhus, which is to around 70% of Passivhaus, and Jan says that they hardly ever have the heating on in her apartment. Hers was built using Cross Laminated Timber, delivered from Europe.

    As a group they decided that they didn’t want gas. They chose to go electric so they could use renewables in the future, and all the houses have air source heat pumps.

    The apartments are Lifetime Homes compliant, as are the larger houses, with some having wet rooms. They are wheelchair accessible and are able to put in hoists if required. Their particular building also has lift access.

    They are designed to be a modern take on a typical Cambridge terrace

    Jan describes the lane and houses as looking like a fairly typical terrace, in keeping with the older terraces of Cambridge while also not looking out of place if it were in the Netherlands, due to the large windows.

    Planning conditions meant that the building on the south west corner had to be designed as a landmark building. It houses two apartments and a gym and workshop underneath.

    The common house has a square design. It has a woodburning stove, which has only been used once as it hasn’t been needed, and like all the houses it has underfloor heating and plenty of natural light.

    Moving in was in two phases

    Moving in was coordinated so that some people moved in just before Christmas 2018, and some just after.

    When setting up the common areas they agreed that what people didn’t want in their own homes but thought could be used elsewhere, they could donate. As part of a quarterly community work day they had a selection process where they decided whether they could use those donated items and in which areas.

    They have a budget for furnishing the common house and any other bits and pieces they still needed were purchased from that fund.

    Living there has exceeded expectations

    Now four months in, Jan says living there has exceeded all her expectations, both from a community point of view, and also with how happy they are with the construction of their homes, their quality and the energy efficiency.

    Find out more

    Visit the website of Marmalade Lane

    Find out more about the K1 community

    Follow Cambridge Cohousing on Twitter

    Transcript

    Please connect with me

    Subscribe, rate and review the podcast in iTunes

    Rate and review the podcast on Stitcher

    Like our Facebook page

    Follow us on Twitter

  • HPH129 : Setting up a cohousing scheme – with Chris Wilson from K1

    HPH129 : Setting up a cohousing scheme – with Chris Wilson from K1

    Chris Wilson explains what has been involved in setting up the K1 cohousing scheme in Cambridge.

    Group Photo

     

    Interview with Chris Wilson

    Chris first became aware of the potential cohousing scheme in 2012 after seeing information on the Cambridge City Council website.

    He had worked for a consensus based non-profit company and knew of people who happily resided in another cohousing group, and so after attending the initial meeting he decided to get involved. Being part of a wider community and having a safe environment in which his kids could grow up were among the key benefits.

    Chris has since been elected Chair of the group and is also a director of the Limited Company that has been set up to oversee the financial matters.

    ©Town
    ©Town

     

    The land is owned by Cambridge City Council

    The land allocated for the K1 scheme is part of the Orchard Park development in Cambridge and is owned by Cambridge City Council. Originally the site had been allocated to a developer, but when they pulled out, consultants who were working with the council encouraged them to use the site for a cohousing project instead.

    They agreed that instead of using the marketing budget they’d had for selling the land to a commercial developer, they would use it to facilitate the formation of a cohousing group, and to find a developer to buy the land and build the houses on it.

    The planning application has been approved for 42 houses on the site.

     

    Consultants have been providing valuable support

    Chris says they were lucky to have the council marketing budget to help get them started, together with the support of the two consultants who were working with the council.

    In 2012 the consultants organised a series of workshops to help the group get to know each other and identify what they wanted to do. Together they produced a client brief setting out what the group wanted to use the site for, roughly how many houses there would be, what shared facilities they wanted and the layout of the site.

     

    The design is almost complete

    Cambridge Architectural Research created the first draft site layout which incorporated 37 houses, a common house and some shared parking and gardens.

    After appointing TOWNhus as their developer and Mole as their architect, the designs were gradually honed through workshops and a consultation process.

    The external appearance is fixed by the planning permission, and the internals are going through a detailed design process for the next 15 weeks. When that has been completed the order will be sent to Sweden for the structural panels to be made.

    The client brief had wanted the houses to be built to the Passivhaus standard, however the TOWNhus system couldn’t provide Passivhaus at an affordable level to make it feasible. Instead they will be using their standard climate shield system which has high levels of insulation and energy efficiency at 75-80% better than building regulations.

    They plan to have no gas on site but use renewable energy for heating, hot water and power. Food will also be grown in the gardens and a car club will be set up.

    ©Town
    ©Town

     

    Ongoing maintenance costs are an important part of the budget

    Lawyers are currently working on the lease and contract between the City Council, the developer and the cohousing group.

    While the group is refining the budget for the build they are also considering the ongoing maintenance of the project and all its shared areas. This includes costs for consultancy, professional support, equipment for the common house and common areas, gardening and management.

     

    Members are still being recruited

    A Limited Company has been set up to manage the financial matters, for which any of the members can stand to be a director.

    Members are encouraged to join at least one of the working groups which have delegated authority to make decisions and plan various aspects of the project. The working groups include Legal, Community, Membership and Publicity.

    With 42 houses due to be on the site, the group currently have 25 members who have reserved places, and 21 members who are still considering it. The group are still actively recruiting to try and get as many of the 42 as they can.

    Each of the members have invested a £250 non-refundable membership fee, and a refundable investment fee of between £1,000 and £5,000 into their company (CCL) which is used to pay for professional services. They anticipate the total amount all members will need to invest by the end will be between £2,500 and £5,000.

    25 of the members have also paid a reservation fee of £1,000 to the developer. They expect to exchange contracts and pay a deposit of 10% later this year, which will be in the region of £25,000 and £40,000 depending on the house.

    The slow pace of the project has led to some members pulling out

    The group have worked hard to maintain a variety of unit types and prices and they hope to attract people with a range of skills and abilities. Attracting members has been challenging and the lengthy timescales of the project have meant that valued members of the community have dropped out because they needed a house sooner than the scheme could provide.

    Chris explains that people are the most important resource. A cohousing project needs people who are enthusiastic, committed, flexible and motivated. There will be challenging times and difficult decisions to make, particularly when it comes to financial matters, but it is ultimately a very rewarding experience.

    ©Town
    ©Town

     

    Transcript

    Download the transcript of the interview with Chris Wilson.

     

    Find out more

    Visit the website of K1

    Follow K1 on Twitter

     

    Other links

    UK Cohousing Network

     

    The Hub update

    This week we have produced a video walk-through to show you what The Hub is all about. You can check it out at houseplanninghelp.com/join 

     

    Please connect with me